Jesus’s Compassion, the Man v the God

Compare supplications made to Jesus the God, they are frequently made through prayer, I don’t recall many successful, immediate results, similarly from those who are blessed by those believed to represent him. A modern LDS insight with regard to not receiving an answer is proposed by an apostle Elder Bednar in the Ensign, August 2016, he asks us, ‘I know you have the faith to be healed, but do you have the faith not to be healed? 

I accept the following observation might be criticised for being naive, but a simplistic comparison indicates that Jesus the man appears more compassionate than Jesus the God. To the extent that Jesus the man, never fails to respond, his does so unconditionally and his response is immediate. Jesus the God however, may seem to many supplicants to be either deaf or requires plenty of self reflection and nuanced contemplation to understand why they haven’t received the sought for blessing. They become engaged in a process of riddle solving, or magic formulaing. What segment of minutiae am I missing to bring about the result I desire. Somehow, the manner of interaction between the supplicant and Jesus the Man has changed from a simple faithful request and immediate result, to a complex spiral of request, denial, reflection, guess work, straining at spiritual gnats, whilst the camel of no response stands obviously before them.

My suggestion is that the compassion of Jesus the Man could not be constrained, he could not walk away, ignoring a call for help. He advocated loving a neighbour, even your enemy, worthiness was never a condition of help, if someone sues for your shirt, give him your coat also Matt 5:40.

How is it that Jesus the God does not respond in the same way? Could it be they are two different characters. One is real, the other perhaps does not exist.